Flipping the Classroom--Or not

An incident with a student today got me thinking about the "flipping the classroom" trend, or buzzword, or fad, or whatever you feel disposed to call it.  However, as I am now an administrator for an indeterminate amount of time, I can't go into the details of the encounter, so I'll skip to the reflection.  Suffice it to say that the student was complaining that some instructors had gone to a "flipped classroom" approach and it didn't work for this particular student.

So, why did it not work for this student?  One of three reasons:
1.  the student did not do her part to make the learning strategy work
2.  the instructors did it "wrong"
3.  the instructional strategy of flipping is not the perfection it is touted as.

Now, I am being purposefully snarky.  I do not hold to #3.  Flipping is something good teachers have been doing for a long time, but good teachers have not been flipping, too.

What about #1?  Highly possible.  Other instructors who have tried to "flip" have complained that students do not respond well to it because it's more work for them. 

#2?  Also highly possible, because the use of any new instructional strategy is not automatic.  It takes time, just like a course redesign is not complete on the first day of the semester.  By "wrong" I don't mean they were clueless and incompetent, but that the method had not reached its full potential because they had little experience with it.

A colleague says of "flipping"--"what a unique and innovative concept--having the students read the material before coming to class!"  Of course there is more to it, in that the class meeting is supposed to be interactive, practice-oriented, discursive, engaged--just not lecture or content delivery. 

I have written on this blog about the pros and cons of lecture.  Suffice to say, some students learn--or think they do--better through lecture.  Of course, this goes to a deeper question--what is learning, and who judges if learning is accomplished?  If I think I have learned, have I?  In the case of classes, an external measurement says so, and in this student's case, she hadn't.  But why? Because she chose not to take advantage of the new method, or didn't understand it, or it was done insufficiently?

I would love to have some input here. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reflecting on Reflection in Learning

Reflection is the subject of my next couple of presentations, so here are my recent jottings. Hopefully a reader can make some sense of them;however, the whole point of this post is that reflection can follow a structure but will not necessarily create a structured record. The reflection record will need to be reshaped to be palatable for a "judge" or "critic" or "instructor." Reflection tends to be framed negatively. If we dig too deep we will only find bad stuff; if we reflect on teaching practice, we will focus on what failed rather than succeeded. Why? Assessment focuses on finding the nonlearners and changing to get more learners, but it ignores that most of the students did learn, so why were there successes? Leads to burnout. Boud & Walker’s idea of validation not well developed but relevant. It is most close to critical thinking—testing it against other knowledge, theories, internal consistency, other data (other learner’s data) Ref
Read more

The LAST Word on Learning Styles

That title might be extreme, but this article nails it, plus giving some good links to other research. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-problem-with-learning-styles/ What is mostly important here is that we do know what universally works in learning (time, multiple modalities, application rather than rote, spaced out study) rather than an overfocus on "what makes me special."
Read more

Lessons in Leadership Failure

This is the outline for a presentation I gave at Toastmasters recently. It was to finish a pathway in their curriculum, but it also my life. There is no lack of books, articles, magazines, and speakers about leadership. A quick look on Amazon shows there are X number of books with leadership in the title.  Ive even written one. But I would venture to say all of them have one thing in common: the writer thinks they are a good leaders and have this leadership things figured out. Although my topic today is leadership I don’t think I have it figured out and recently I learned a lot about failure in leaders and in myself as a leader.  I was asked to lead a large part of our accreditation. I’ve spoken on this before that it’s called a Quality Enhancement Plan, whereby the institution has to pick a problem and construct a specific plan to address it.  I’ve had a year not to reflect—or not—on how it went and what I learned about myself.  I could share  lot, but in the time I have
Read more