My Artificial Intelligence Experiment--Meet it Head On

 This was an assignment I gave my business communication students this January, having grown tired of AI-generated submissions and wanting to confront the issue. I am presenting on this to our faculty March 1--I don't have IRB approval to do more with the results, but I did get permission from ten students to use their answers in my presentation.

Choose one of the following writing tasks. Go to an AI writing tool (Google Bard, Chat Gpt4, etc.) and put the prompt in:

1.  Brainstorm ideas/topics for social media posts for a small business that provides pet care and grooming products and services.

2.  Write a negative news letter (also referred to as a bad news letter) to a client explaining that the company will not be able to replace a pair of pet clippers it sold because the clippers were damaged and returned after the warranty expired.

3.  Explain the concept of a cat café with a personal example.

Read the output critically and slowly. Answer these questions

  1. How is it different from your own writing?

  2. What is “good” (effective, clear, etc.) about it in terms of the qualities of business writing?

  3. What is “poor” (ineffective, unclear, etc.) about it in terms of the qualities of business writing?

  4. How would you use this output in a real situation?

  5. My goal is not to say “never touch generative AI.” But my goal is to make you think critically and realistically about its value and limitations.  Yes, it will take care of small writing tasks quickly. But what can it not do?

Post the following to the discussion board.

  1. Your answers to the questions in the textbox of the discussion board, being sure to use tools to edit and proofread.

  2. As an attachment, the AI generated document. 

  3. The rubric is available below this link.

Read and respond to at least one classmate, which includes their AI generated document and their post answering the questions.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reflecting on Reflection in Learning

Reflection is the subject of my next couple of presentations, so here are my recent jottings. Hopefully a reader can make some sense of them;however, the whole point of this post is that reflection can follow a structure but will not necessarily create a structured record. The reflection record will need to be reshaped to be palatable for a "judge" or "critic" or "instructor." Reflection tends to be framed negatively. If we dig too deep we will only find bad stuff; if we reflect on teaching practice, we will focus on what failed rather than succeeded. Why? Assessment focuses on finding the nonlearners and changing to get more learners, but it ignores that most of the students did learn, so why were there successes? Leads to burnout. Boud & Walker’s idea of validation not well developed but relevant. It is most close to critical thinking—testing it against other knowledge, theories, internal consistency, other data (other learner’s data) Ref
Read more

The LAST Word on Learning Styles

That title might be extreme, but this article nails it, plus giving some good links to other research. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-problem-with-learning-styles/ What is mostly important here is that we do know what universally works in learning (time, multiple modalities, application rather than rote, spaced out study) rather than an overfocus on "what makes me special."
Read more

Lessons in Leadership Failure

This is the outline for a presentation I gave at Toastmasters recently. It was to finish a pathway in their curriculum, but it also my life. There is no lack of books, articles, magazines, and speakers about leadership. A quick look on Amazon shows there are X number of books with leadership in the title.  Ive even written one. But I would venture to say all of them have one thing in common: the writer thinks they are a good leaders and have this leadership things figured out. Although my topic today is leadership I don’t think I have it figured out and recently I learned a lot about failure in leaders and in myself as a leader.  I was asked to lead a large part of our accreditation. I’ve spoken on this before that it’s called a Quality Enhancement Plan, whereby the institution has to pick a problem and construct a specific plan to address it.  I’ve had a year not to reflect—or not—on how it went and what I learned about myself.  I could share  lot, but in the time I have
Read more