Post #6, Reflections on Teaching this semester: Rigor

I used to think rigor meant a lot of work. 

That means I have to grade it, and sometimes it does become busy work and excessive. I require short discussion posts about certain assignments, and I warn them to keep it to two sentences. "You don't want to write more and I don't want to read it." They get the point.

Rigor means justifiable high standards, communicated clearly, with consequences but also access to needed resources. 

Justifiable high standards: Writing should be reader-ready. I teach writing, so superficial mistakes are unacceptable. There are abundant tools to avoid it. 

Communicated clearly: Transparency in teaching and learning is a valuable practice. Look it up. But don't, like me, overexplain. 

With consequences: See my Revise and Resubmit  post earlier. 

Access to needed resources: How I define equity. It is unfair to assign a task that not everyone has the tools to complete--if they put the effort in.  I believe in the meritocracy of hard work. 

Now, these posts are supposed to be about me reflecting, and reflecting is not about admiring one's reflection in the mirror but adjusting--combing hair, getting the spinach out of one's front teeth.  

I am making it an intentional point to make resources available and accessible. It's hard sometimes--how many times do I have to remind them? Well, after the first high-stakes assignment and either success or failure, that's probably enough. They should get the feedback to make a decision, and then the reminders are just nagging. 

Which brings us to the feedback issue. There is such as thing as too much feedback.  Feedback should be focused based on the material covered to this point, not everything that might be covered in the course. If the focus of the course so far has been unity and coherence, maybe feedback about use of examples is not well timed. Just saying. I tend to give way too much, and holding back helps. 

I have learned the value of LESS IS MORE and JUST IN TIME in teaching. It took me a while. I am a slow learner.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reflecting on Reflection in Learning

Reflection is the subject of my next couple of presentations, so here are my recent jottings. Hopefully a reader can make some sense of them;however, the whole point of this post is that reflection can follow a structure but will not necessarily create a structured record. The reflection record will need to be reshaped to be palatable for a "judge" or "critic" or "instructor." Reflection tends to be framed negatively. If we dig too deep we will only find bad stuff; if we reflect on teaching practice, we will focus on what failed rather than succeeded. Why? Assessment focuses on finding the nonlearners and changing to get more learners, but it ignores that most of the students did learn, so why were there successes? Leads to burnout. Boud & Walker’s idea of validation not well developed but relevant. It is most close to critical thinking—testing it against other knowledge, theories, internal consistency, other data (other learner’s data) Ref
Read more

The LAST Word on Learning Styles

That title might be extreme, but this article nails it, plus giving some good links to other research. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-problem-with-learning-styles/ What is mostly important here is that we do know what universally works in learning (time, multiple modalities, application rather than rote, spaced out study) rather than an overfocus on "what makes me special."
Read more

Lessons in Leadership Failure

This is the outline for a presentation I gave at Toastmasters recently. It was to finish a pathway in their curriculum, but it also my life. There is no lack of books, articles, magazines, and speakers about leadership. A quick look on Amazon shows there are X number of books with leadership in the title.  Ive even written one. But I would venture to say all of them have one thing in common: the writer thinks they are a good leaders and have this leadership things figured out. Although my topic today is leadership I don’t think I have it figured out and recently I learned a lot about failure in leaders and in myself as a leader.  I was asked to lead a large part of our accreditation. I’ve spoken on this before that it’s called a Quality Enhancement Plan, whereby the institution has to pick a problem and construct a specific plan to address it.  I’ve had a year not to reflect—or not—on how it went and what I learned about myself.  I could share  lot, but in the time I have
Read more