Disturbing questions

I've been thinking about the faculty member's power in the classroom. In spending time with some colleagues, I've been wondering how much of their teaching career is about that power over students rather than love of discipline, service to the community, career advancement, or something else.

A related question, how much can we expect our students to "confess" their experience?

I ask this because I sat in a session in a conference recently in which the presenter described an exercise they (gender unidentified here) ask students in the class to divide themselves in groups by subcultures. After that, they each have to sit in front of the class (in the group) and answer the question "What is hard for you as a member of your subculture about living in this country?" And they each must talk for two minutes on this.

Obviously, this instructor has an agenda.

I am appalled by this exercise. It seems a blatant use of the instructor's power. What if a student does not want to says what's hard? What if they don't think anything is hard? What if one group of students says their lives are harder than another group? What if a student is a member of two or three subcultures? What if their revelations just exacerbate stereotypes?

Thoughts?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reflecting on Reflection in Learning

Reflection is the subject of my next couple of presentations, so here are my recent jottings. Hopefully a reader can make some sense of them;however, the whole point of this post is that reflection can follow a structure but will not necessarily create a structured record. The reflection record will need to be reshaped to be palatable for a "judge" or "critic" or "instructor." Reflection tends to be framed negatively. If we dig too deep we will only find bad stuff; if we reflect on teaching practice, we will focus on what failed rather than succeeded. Why? Assessment focuses on finding the nonlearners and changing to get more learners, but it ignores that most of the students did learn, so why were there successes? Leads to burnout. Boud & Walker’s idea of validation not well developed but relevant. It is most close to critical thinking—testing it against other knowledge, theories, internal consistency, other data (other learner’s data) Ref
Read more

The LAST Word on Learning Styles

That title might be extreme, but this article nails it, plus giving some good links to other research. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-problem-with-learning-styles/ What is mostly important here is that we do know what universally works in learning (time, multiple modalities, application rather than rote, spaced out study) rather than an overfocus on "what makes me special."
Read more

Lessons in Leadership Failure

This is the outline for a presentation I gave at Toastmasters recently. It was to finish a pathway in their curriculum, but it also my life. There is no lack of books, articles, magazines, and speakers about leadership. A quick look on Amazon shows there are X number of books with leadership in the title.  Ive even written one. But I would venture to say all of them have one thing in common: the writer thinks they are a good leaders and have this leadership things figured out. Although my topic today is leadership I don’t think I have it figured out and recently I learned a lot about failure in leaders and in myself as a leader.  I was asked to lead a large part of our accreditation. I’ve spoken on this before that it’s called a Quality Enhancement Plan, whereby the institution has to pick a problem and construct a specific plan to address it.  I’ve had a year not to reflect—or not—on how it went and what I learned about myself.  I could share  lot, but in the time I have
Read more