The Debate Continues: The Value of the Liberal Arts

I'll start with a link to this article: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/11/13/new-report-shows-colleges-how-bridge-gap-between-liberal-arts-and-work-force

Few days go by that I don't see something in higher education news about the value of the liberal arts curriculum. As a professor in a school of liberal arts, these articles get my attention, but they basically revolve around these ideas:
1. Liberal arts majors are declining in numbers (i.e., the number of student majoring in liberal arts discipine, typically history and English);
2. This means something terrible (the end of civilization, critical thinking, higher education values, etc.); and
3. Employers still want liberal arts majors because of their "human" skills (better than soft skills, at least) and other attributes.

My take:
1. A liberal arts major only has human skills if he/she cultivates them, which takes intentionality. You can read lots of great novels and still not have the sense to send a thank you note after an interview.
2. The liberal arts professors and leaders have watered down their disciplines (I won't even get into the political end of the matter) and weakened the education the students should receive;
3. A STEM major is not immune to appreciating the liberal arts; this whole debate involves one of the biggest false dichotomies around, and
4. Neither is a liberal arts major ignorant of science and math. Recently a coworker said she was surprised that an English major learned and completed a project with a complicated coding language, as if majoring in English closed off someone's mathematical ability. The myth is that liberal arts majors choose those majors because they "aren't any good" at STEM subjects. That is true of some, but definitely not all. We can be great at math and science but just not interested in studying it for four years.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reflecting on Reflection in Learning

Reflection is the subject of my next couple of presentations, so here are my recent jottings. Hopefully a reader can make some sense of them;however, the whole point of this post is that reflection can follow a structure but will not necessarily create a structured record. The reflection record will need to be reshaped to be palatable for a "judge" or "critic" or "instructor." Reflection tends to be framed negatively. If we dig too deep we will only find bad stuff; if we reflect on teaching practice, we will focus on what failed rather than succeeded. Why? Assessment focuses on finding the nonlearners and changing to get more learners, but it ignores that most of the students did learn, so why were there successes? Leads to burnout. Boud & Walker’s idea of validation not well developed but relevant. It is most close to critical thinking—testing it against other knowledge, theories, internal consistency, other data (other learner’s data) Ref
Read more

The LAST Word on Learning Styles

That title might be extreme, but this article nails it, plus giving some good links to other research. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-problem-with-learning-styles/ What is mostly important here is that we do know what universally works in learning (time, multiple modalities, application rather than rote, spaced out study) rather than an overfocus on "what makes me special."
Read more

Lessons in Leadership Failure

This is the outline for a presentation I gave at Toastmasters recently. It was to finish a pathway in their curriculum, but it also my life. There is no lack of books, articles, magazines, and speakers about leadership. A quick look on Amazon shows there are X number of books with leadership in the title.  Ive even written one. But I would venture to say all of them have one thing in common: the writer thinks they are a good leaders and have this leadership things figured out. Although my topic today is leadership I don’t think I have it figured out and recently I learned a lot about failure in leaders and in myself as a leader.  I was asked to lead a large part of our accreditation. I’ve spoken on this before that it’s called a Quality Enhancement Plan, whereby the institution has to pick a problem and construct a specific plan to address it.  I’ve had a year not to reflect—or not—on how it went and what I learned about myself.  I could share  lot, but in the time I have
Read more