What's up with the syllabus
I just received yet another newsletter email from a teaching and learning organization about making the syllabus "fun."
Am I the only one who thinks the students don't care about the format, font, or funniness (humor) of the syllabus, and that they are more concerned about what's in it?
Our syllabi are so long with so much legal information (Title IX, ADA, etc.) that we should just accept it for what it is--a boring but vastly necessary document. Everything doesn't have to be zippy and zappy.
My son went to the National Archives last week on a trip to D.C. He said people were saying "It's already old and faded." Well, duh. It's not the color; it's the content.
I'm going to stick with my boring, required syllabus and save my charisma for the class activities.
Am I the only one who thinks the students don't care about the format, font, or funniness (humor) of the syllabus, and that they are more concerned about what's in it?
Our syllabi are so long with so much legal information (Title IX, ADA, etc.) that we should just accept it for what it is--a boring but vastly necessary document. Everything doesn't have to be zippy and zappy.
My son went to the National Archives last week on a trip to D.C. He said people were saying "It's already old and faded." Well, duh. It's not the color; it's the content.
I'm going to stick with my boring, required syllabus and save my charisma for the class activities.
Comments
Post a Comment