Writing for Academics

This rather simplistic article/listicle may have some wisdom:

https://getpocket.com/explore/item/five-steps-to-become-a-better-writer?utm_source=pocket-newtab

As obvious as it sounds, one cannot write better unless one writes A LOT. Too many people want to write the minimal amount.

It is assumed that academics (or those who teach in college--not always exactly the same group) do write a great deal, publish a great deal, etc. Actually, most college instructors and professors don't write that much. We publish either because we have to to keep our positions; our positions are primarily about publishing; or we've found a way or angle that ensures we can get published.  Sometimes it's what the trends are, sometimes it's particular personal strengths. Getting an article or book chapter published is darned hard work, and most of us avoid it if we can. Most colleges are teaching institutions and don't expect the publishing to a high degree. Why do I say that? Because most colleges are community colleges, state colleges, or small liberal arts colleges.

Either way, one must write. It's about fluency. I have, due to personal problems in my marriage, been hiding from writing but now am coming out of the shadows (I no longer live with my husband, and I have no TV, so that helps--I'm not fighting with him and not distracted). Distractions are the greatest barriers.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reflecting on Reflection in Learning

Reflection is the subject of my next couple of presentations, so here are my recent jottings. Hopefully a reader can make some sense of them;however, the whole point of this post is that reflection can follow a structure but will not necessarily create a structured record. The reflection record will need to be reshaped to be palatable for a "judge" or "critic" or "instructor." Reflection tends to be framed negatively. If we dig too deep we will only find bad stuff; if we reflect on teaching practice, we will focus on what failed rather than succeeded. Why? Assessment focuses on finding the nonlearners and changing to get more learners, but it ignores that most of the students did learn, so why were there successes? Leads to burnout. Boud & Walker’s idea of validation not well developed but relevant. It is most close to critical thinking—testing it against other knowledge, theories, internal consistency, other data (other learner’s data) Ref
Read more

The LAST Word on Learning Styles

That title might be extreme, but this article nails it, plus giving some good links to other research. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-problem-with-learning-styles/ What is mostly important here is that we do know what universally works in learning (time, multiple modalities, application rather than rote, spaced out study) rather than an overfocus on "what makes me special."
Read more

Lessons in Leadership Failure

This is the outline for a presentation I gave at Toastmasters recently. It was to finish a pathway in their curriculum, but it also my life. There is no lack of books, articles, magazines, and speakers about leadership. A quick look on Amazon shows there are X number of books with leadership in the title.  Ive even written one. But I would venture to say all of them have one thing in common: the writer thinks they are a good leaders and have this leadership things figured out. Although my topic today is leadership I don’t think I have it figured out and recently I learned a lot about failure in leaders and in myself as a leader.  I was asked to lead a large part of our accreditation. I’ve spoken on this before that it’s called a Quality Enhancement Plan, whereby the institution has to pick a problem and construct a specific plan to address it.  I’ve had a year not to reflect—or not—on how it went and what I learned about myself.  I could share  lot, but in the time I have
Read more