Posts

Showing posts from May, 2019

Just wondering?

Anyone else get that survey from Chronicle of Higher Ed about tenure of presidents? I took it, although I couldn't answer every question. While I have my suspicions, I did want to skew the data with feelings rather than thoughts (I make a big distinction between the two even though it appears others do not do so any longer.)

The downside of tenure

I am tenured so I can complain about it. The adage, "The reason the fights in academia are so bitter is because the stakes are so low" is one of my favorites. I have been embroiled in one that hinged on a few hundred dollars a year in pay. I would have gladly paid that to not have lost all this sleep. Tenure is a good thing--I'm not giving mine up--but it has unintended consequences. It means faculty are disincentivized. We know that a lot of faculty "rest" (euphemism) after getting it. We also know, but don't want to admit it, that tenure discourages faculty from looking elsewhere even when doing so would be a good thing, because they don't want to go through tenure again (it can be hellacious and risky). And because faculty are discouraged from leaving, they stay. They have institutional memory. A good thing, but also the grounds for long-standing grudges and bitterness over really small things to fester and become the reason for payback. I...

Access colleges, access students

Fascinating article on Access college students. Some hidden assumptions here that access students are less than, and that access colleges don't provide access to elitist circle. Maybe some of us don't want to be in them.  https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2019/05/23/pew-study-finds-more-poor-students-attending-college?utm_source=Inside+Higher+Ed&utm_campaign=52d50b2bd6-DNU_2019_COPY_02&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_1fcbc04421-52d50b2bd6-198482621&mc_cid=52d50b2bd6&mc_eid=ab27a3f05f